April 10, 2008...1:21 pm

Presenting the 2008 UW-Madison Campus Elite tournament

Jump to Comments

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Welcome to the Campus Elite tournament selection blog post, sponsored by Jins Chicken and Fish.

The following is the much-anticipated list of campus elites as selected by the “campus elite selection committee” that shall remain anonymous for their personal protection. All members of the committee helped to create a list of the top 20 current campus elites. A few specifics that must be addressed before looking at those selected:

-Each match-up will be delt with by a public vote at the website noted at the bottom of this blog post. The “score” is kept secret as to add suspense. We strongly encourage you to add comments on the bottom of this blog post, and at the blog website where the voting is held. The comments discussing the aspects of each match up would be helpful.

-You can vote on whatever basis you want, however, it is important to consider the match-ups. Exactly what commitment does each person have to the campus? How elite are they in their sphere of campus (e.g. an elite from the Greek Community that dominates that sphere might be more impressive than someone more known to the rest of the student body)? How influential do yousee them? If the two had to show you a resume, which would impress you more? Which have you heard of more? Who has the potential to take on eliteness across a grueling competition (not to influence you, but ASM is known to… fall off items… if you know what I mean)? Hell, you could select by a coin-toss. Most importantly: basketball metaphors are very much appreciated to make this more fun. For example, Suchita Shah, being really short, is known as a fast paced team, with great guards, intense man-to-man defense, but a bit short when it comes to down-low play.

-Like the NCAA tournament, the last 10 games were very important. Therefore, someone who was “elite” years ago and remains on campus, was less likely to get the nod over a current/up-and-coming elite

-Strength of Schedule (SOS) and quality wins were very important. Leading an obscure group was less impressive than a major role in a larger or established organization

-This list is by no means perfect. Some people were forgotten or left off. There might be an NIT campus elite tournament, but I’ll let Something Verbose handle that.

-The 20 elites who made the list were ranked according to their current eliteness. Therefore, it is safe to assume the #1 is more elite than #20, according to the committee. However, like the NCAA tournament, head-to-head match-ups are far more important than seeding.

-Seeds 14-20 (the lowest 6) will be involved in a “play-in game” to move on to the first round. This will ensure 16 teams. For example, the winner of #16 vs. #17 will then take on the top seed in the tournament.

-Although there are not four #1 seeds, the top four in the tournament are considered the tops in their part of the bracket. Each four team pod will be in a different region. The names/locations of the regional match-ups will be put into an actual bracket after the play-in games are complete.

-And most importantly: the tournament is for the lulz.

Hopefully everyone had their name spelled correctly. Also, we added as much to their resume as we could think of, and most importantly, we wanted to note the most IMPORTANT aspect of each resume. But, should we be missing SERIOUS information, feel free to include it, although the committee does not feel responsible for not including everything, because by definition, it’s up to the elite to promote their own resume to get further in this competition. If they don’t care, so be it.

And now, for the seeding:

#1 Suchita ShahThe Queen Bee, College Democrats Vice Chair for two years, Jeopardy, Tour Guide,ASM, Honors, got into Harvard but turned them down, Medical Scholar, Badger Herald, Chancellor’s Search Committee, ISA

Suchita’s number one was solidified with her impressive win at Texas.

Jeopardy helped, too.

#2 Eli Judge- Madison Common Council (District 8), Students for a Fair Wisconsin/Students for Equality, College Democrats, Founder/Treasurer (2 years) of the Gay, bisexual, progressive male fraternity on campus, heavily involved with neighborhood associations and new ASM programs like the watch program, blogger — Judge’s win in his conference tournament (passing the photo ordinance) was important to the selection committee, but Suchita’s chance at $100,000 outweighed in the mind of the committee.

#3 Jeff Wright- ASM: Shared Governance Committee, ASM Council Rep, generally involved with campus politics, Students for a Fair Wisconsin

#4 Gestina Sewell- Chair of ASM, Class of 2008 President

#5 John Barnhardt- President of the Wisconsin Union. Leader on the new South Campus Union, helped with. Took the lead on the new south campus union and is involved with local issues (that involve the Union) like the Zimmermann vigil.

#6 Alex Gallagher- Well respected member of ASM, known for his work on the SSFC

#7 Jason Smathers- Badger Herald, WUD, ASM, House Fellow, WSUM show, video guru

#8 Mike Gendell – Editor-in-Chief of the Badger Herald

#9 Jill Klosterman – Editor-in-Chief of the Daily Cardinal

#10 Sara Mikolajczak – Chair of the College Republicans

#11 Brittany Wiegand- President of a large sorority, heavily involved with UW Greek government, ASM, SSFC

#12 Jess Pavlic- CNI/State Langdon, ASM (committee chair), Shared Gov.

#13 David Lapidus- DCB candidate, College Republicans e-board, Vets-for-Vets, People Opposing Prejudices, College Democrats blogger, former Herald editorial writer, intern with Pacific Economics, was nominated for Iron Cross as a Sophomore

#14 Jeff Rolling- President-Elect of the Wisconsin Union.  Former head of WISPIRG

#15 David Christopher- Student Involvement Coordinator for the Union building project, Big Ten Network show, WUD, Tour Guide Program Coordinator, various political activism, co-owner of what might be the largest television in the campus area

#16 Wyndham Manning- WUD, Dane County Board Supervisor-elect

#17 A. Kumar - Dane County Board Supervisor, SLAC, general progressivism on campus

#18 Dean Bumbaca- former President of largest frat on campus, chief justice of UW Greek Judicial Board, famous for being written on the stalls of College Library

#19 Ami ElShareif- Chair of Students for Obama, recently in the New York Times

#20 Claire Rydell- newly elected College Democrats chair, WUD-DLS

There will be several play-in games to determine the eight first round match-ups.

And thus, we are pleased to announce the play-in games. The voting starts now and will end at an undisclosed time on Saturday. The first round match ups will start Saturday night and run until Tuesday. The second round will go until Thursday and the final four will take place next weekend.

#13 David Lapidus vs. #20 Claire Rydell – To be held in Witte 301A

#14 Jeff Rolling vs. #19 Ami ElShareif – To be held at the WARF

#15 David Christopher vs #18 Dean Bumbaca- To be held behind the counter at Qdoba on State Street

# 16 W. Manning vs. #17 A. Kumar- To be held in the CFACT office

THE WEBSITE FOR THE TOURNAMENT:

www.campuselite.blogspot.com

96 Comments

  • Remember: just as the last 10 games are important for NCAA seeding, the involvement recent was important here too. So, for example, Kumar was hurt by his age/move away from SLAC/campus involvement and into DCB affairs. As evident by ANY DCB vote in the press and voting total during their elections, it’s hardly a position campus goes crazy over.

    Flores, Sol, Porton… controversial people left out

    We did not include graduate students.

  • best game of the tournament

    will be 8 Gendell vs 9 Klosterman

    It’s like USC with OJ Mayo against Beasley and Kansas State.

  • “There might be an NIT campus elite tournament, but I’ll let Something Verbose handle that.”

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!

    Btw, you have Eli’s district wrong. WTF CB?

  • But we want more

    College Dems of Wisconsin Hate Fest

  • Deal with it on the post below where you started the hating.

  • I’m pissed, and hurt, that I did not get a chance to be part of the “elite tournament.” I was part of this UW’s 100+ year rowing tradition! you cript keeper. I’m from a small town! you jerk! I got into the University of Colorado-Boulder! I know Suchita! That counts for something!!

  • Hey CB… will you fix my name? It’s BrittANy Wiegand. I’m a committee chair for ASM also, work at MCSC, and Senior Class Treasurer…

    let the games begin!!!

  • Suchita, Judge, Wright, Lapidus.

  • what have you done now.

  • The Critical Badger

    some updates:

    Kumar has a slight lead over Manning, 54-46

    Lapidus hit some 3s early and Claire has started off cold… Lapidus is up 70-30

    Bumbaca has a 1 vote lead

    Rolling and ElShareif remain tied

  • The Critical Badger

    those are %s btw

  • Swiftboat Badgers for Truth

    I heard Suchita, due to her involvement with ASM, was planning on engineering the bankruptcy of McTaggarts so the ASM grocery store would be more successful…

    Paid for by Swiftboat Badgers for Truth

  • why no kiefer?
    no lewien?
    they have more influence than ami or clarie!

  • Mostly because Kiefer and Lewien are essentially retired.

    Kiefer’s going to play in the overseas league, and Lewien has been out for a year now. Plus he’s a grad student now, I think:

    “We did not include graduate students.” -CB

  • I think Lewien was drafted by the CEDL last year. That’s the Campus Elite Development League.

  • This is amazing! You forgot to put yourself in this though.

    Also, where is Dovere and/or Huston of the Roosevelt Institution, Mitra Jalali?

    Edit by the CB- you got some info wrong, Steve.

  • Basically everyone here is white, save Suchita, Kumar, Gestina, everyone here is white. You racist bastard!

  • Round One:
    Lapidas over Rydell, Christopher over Bumbaca, ElShareif over Rolling, Manning over Kumar.

    Round Two:
    Lapidas over Gestina, Barnhardt over Pavlic, Judge over Chistopher, Smathers over Mikolajczak, Wright over ElShareif, Gallagher over Wiegand, Shah over Kumar, Gendall over Klosterman.

    Round Three:
    Lapidas over Barnhardt, Judge over Smathers, Gallagher over Wright, Shah over Gendall.

    Round Four:
    Judge over Lapidas, Shah over Gallagher.

    Winner:

    Judge.

  • My picks:

    Round 1-
    Lapidus over Rydell
    Christopher over Bumbaca
    Rolling over ElShareif
    Kumar over Manning

    Round 2-
    Lapidus over Sewell
    Barnhardt over Pavlic
    Judge over Christopher
    Smathers over Mikolajczak
    Wright over Rolling
    Gallagher over Wiegand
    Shah over Kumar
    Gendall over Klosterman

    Round 3 (ELITE eight)
    Lapidus over Barnhardt
    Smathers over Judge
    Wright over Gallagher
    Shah over Gendall

    Round 4 (Final Four)
    Smathers over Lapidus
    Shah over Wright

    Finals
    Shah over Smathers

    Winner: Shah

  • You forgot Ami. that’s 20 percent minority, which is more than the university as a whole.

  • Nope, everyone’s a racist and Ami is white.

  • resume rules for elite…

    1) have lots of letters in capslock (ASM,CEDLE,WUD)
    2) have a title
    I)Executive
    a) President
    b) Vice-Pres
    c) Treasurer
    d) e-board
    II) Semi-Exec but sounds good anyway
    a) Chair
    b) ___ Chief or Chief ___
    c) ___ Board
    d) Head of ___
    3) be in C-Dems, C-Reps
    4)Post on CB
    5) must have name, that if brought up, people know who you are after the first vowel
    6) News
    I)Must write for the news (papers, blogs)
    II) Must speak of the news (radio, tv)
    III) Must be in the news. (obvi!)
    IV) Must be mentioned on CB
    7) Mainstream Code
    I) Know of Terms
    a) leet
    b) lolz
    c) pwned
    d) 1337
    II) Should know what the Sweet Sixteen is
    8) Can be in Greek community
    9) Bonus points for being on game shows
    10) Should see Ivy but instead sees Cardinal

  • Smathers in your final? WTF

  • 8 + ) = 8)

  • Hahaha. And Ami’s not white.

  • Round 1:
    Suchita over Manning
    Judge over Christopher
    Wright over Rolling
    Lapidus over Sewell
    Barnhardt over Pavlic
    Gallagher over Wiegand
    Smathers over Mikolajczak
    Gendall over Klosterman

    Final Four:
    Suchita over Lapidus
    Judge over Wright

    Champion: Judge

  • A few updates:

    Lapidus is blowing out Rydell

    Manning has a slight edge over Kumar

    ElShareif up by a few on Rolling

    Christopher is having no problem with Bumbaca

  • Should being nominated for something really be listed? Brittney Wiegand should be spelt BrittANy. Jess Pavlic is also on the Business Improvement District Board of Madison, WISPIRG anything; are you serious?, if you put down Jeff Wright as an ASM council member you also need to add the same to BrittANy Wiegand, Alex Gallagher, and Jess Pavlic. Just to be fair. Also Jason Smathers is a member of ASM Shared Governance. I believe he sits on the WSUM board.

    People need to look at effectiveness of these candidates… ie #4

  • Elsharief is the cinderella!

    She is middle eastern, by US census official definition that makes her caucasian.

  • Watch out for Mikolajczak too, Smathers should worry. She’s a vicious beast who fights dirty, and looks great in a pant suit too.

  • “As evident by ANY DCB vote in the press and voting total during their elections, it’s hardly a position campus goes crazy over.”

    That double edged sword seemed to cut Kumar, but not Lapidus. Wasen’t there an election which Lapidus was absolutely destroyed by Kumar? Yet, Lapidus still listed it as his first credential, and received a markedly higher seed?

    You say recent activity is important, yet Lapidus’s resume is peppered with ‘formers’ and ’sophomore year.’ It also includes an internship which deals less with the campus than Ashok’s seat in district 5. Cronyism? I don’t know…It looks to be somewhat spurious seeding. I don’t really care, but I just thought I’d point it out.

    Also, did anyone else notice that Kumar is the only one who didn’t get a first name from Danny?

    Lapidus is a nice guy, but only you (or possibly a diebold voting machine) could set up an election which Lapidus is considered more elite than Kumar.

  • The Critical Badger

    We concluded that Lapidus was active enough in recent years, through organizations like Vets-for-Vets, the Badger Herald, POP, and some connection to ASM, not to mention the hoopla surrounding his decision to not to run just a few months ago. Oh, and moderating the District 5 debate. Combined with his strong resume from the past, it was worthy of a 13 seed.

    Like Kumar, he has a play-in game.

  • The Critical Badger

    You can say “only you” would set up that election… but then again… it only shows how out-of-touch you are with current students.

    Ashok’s groupies have either graduated, or are for the most part, older UW students.

    No underclassmen remember him anymore. The ship has sailed.

  • The Critical Badger

    I forgot to add: people on the cmte did not like how Ashok had to basically hide his support of Manning during the recent campaign. That’s a sign of weakness. He was only useful in activating the sliver of campus that still supports him.

    No formal endorsement. No letter to the editor. Nothing on a website. There was utter radio silence.

    Adding that to his loss in the Woods campaign, failure to defeat the SUI, the falling off of SLAC on campus, and death to the “radical” activism of ASM reps, indicated to us that his “movement” is dead. Pragmatic Progressivism of Eli Judge is “in”.

  • “moderating the District 5 debate” – there’s that sword again. The man who holds the seat not important, yet the moderator of the debate which nominates his predecessor is?

    Moderating the debate didn’t Opsal on the list, yet it did wonders “former Dane County Board candidate David Lapidus.” (CB 3/25/08)

    “not to mention the hoopla surrounding his decision to not to run just a few months ago.” So not running for an office that nobody cares about is grounds to be called elite?

    By any chance, is Lapidus on the selection committee? And one last thing, ‘No underclassmen remember him anymore.’ Just out of curiosity, how many people on these boards are underclassmen anyway?

  • I’ll concede that Kumar is on his way out while Judge is on his way in, but I still think #17 is a bit low.

  • The Critical Badger

    A few things.

    First, these are just components that make up the whole. Moderating was to show Lapidus as still significant. Kumar, *is* significant, just not as much on campus as in say… 2005 and 2006. He’s a 5th year senior who focuses on county issues.

    We considered CAMPUS activism are more important, but certainly took into consideration the entire resume.

    Second, Opsal doesn’t have enough involvement. Moderating wasn’t really relevent for him.

    Lapidus did not have a say on the final list. He suggested some people but was not important to his seeding. I don’t see what’s so controversial about both Lapidus/Kumar having play-in games, and given Lapidus having slightly more current involvement on campus, giving him a slightly higher seed.

    Many underclassmen read this blog. Doesn’t matter either way.

  • The Critical Badger

    Just to re-affirm, you have to understand the criteria we used. Non-campus work was significant less important than the campus work. Thus, a play-in seed was deemed adequate.

    And hey, you know, if it’s too low, then he’ll just win his way to the top. Look at 10th seed Davidson.

  • No offense to Lapidus or his impeccable resume. I’m just offering my opinion. I suppose you could consider me a ‘Bob Knight-esq’ figure. (this time I’ll try to be more faithful to basketball lingo.)
    It seems as if you see Kumar as a ‘Pistol Pete’ – prolific in his youth, yet falling off in old age. Justifying your decision to rank him so low may not be a ‘lay up,’ but it is your blog. I just don’t see it that way.
    I’m not trying to get ‘T’d up’ here, just looking to add some fodder for some ‘1-on-1′ intellectual sparring.

  • I think you mean ’swish.’

  • i can’t decide if i’m disgusted by this or impressed.

    also, bubbles is a commenter elite. his resume rules for elites post is hilarious.

  • “Lapidus is blowing out Rydell”

    “Manning has a slight edge over Kumar”

    …and our judging panel of viewers at home appears to be in the process of declaring the CB the overwhelming winner of the above seeding debate. Seriously, how can you argue he should be a higher seed when he isnt even leading against Manning.

  • Thanks for advocating on my behalf, and of course I’m right ;) … but it’s about MATCH UPs, NOT JUST SEEDING. Otherwise, why hold a tournament? #1 would always win.

    Manning-Kumar is very close right now.

    Lapidus… still up big time.

  • See, what just happened in the last 2 minutes: someone tried to vote for Kumar like, 20 times.

    I have IP tracking on the polls and it knows when you’re switching browsers, deleting cookies, at College Library… etc…. so…. don’t even try it.

  • “See, what just happened in the last 2 minutes: someone tried to vote for Kumar like, 20 times.”

    that is just sad. get a life, people.

  • Campus elites deciding who among them is slightly more elite…. it’s what the Founding Fathers would have done

  • “also, bubbles is a commenter elite…”

    I disagree

    bubbles : elites :: me : Steve

  • the elites are so vain, they probably think this tournament is about them.
    oh, wait…

  • I want to see more picks. Make a bracket, lets start a pool!!

  • Gosh I suck at being an organization for the elites. Better get yourself into the CB’s top 20 or your a nobody!

    Peace and Love,

    I’ve gone to Tahiti

  • You know that ‘progressive’ politics has declined on this campus when about 50 of the liberal ‘elite’ (resumee padders) are out here complimenting each other on their facade of a political record.

    Perhaps Judge’s ‘pragmatic progressivism’ is ‘in.’ Perhaps radical politics has declined in UW in recent years.

    And the decline of a real social justice movement has responded in kind.

  • omg ya because NO REAL SOLUTIONS can EVER happen when you play in the SYSTEM!!!1111!!!!

    Please. People in jail not paying money for phone calls is no less REAL than Judge having watch programs or more money for the RCC.

  • I think Patrick should be made a blogger elite. I live with him and this blog has taken him from me as a friend. His day consists over wearily moping about the room and halfheartedly browsing through articles about nuclear energy and waiting with frenzied anticipation for another post. He then descends into alternating fits of laughter, rage, and quasi-orgasmic joy depending on what the critical badger tells him. He is unreachable at these times. GIVE ME BACK MY ROOMMATE CB!

  • The CB is a home-wrecker.

  • I can’t believe it has taken Patrick this long to comment.

  • Last update of the night until I head out (omg ,wherez teh CB goin?!)

    Lapidus has been shooting 62% from the field and is taking Rydell out behind the tool shed on this one.

    Ami of SFO started off close but pulled away with good defense and working the ball down low. She’s up big.

    Kumar was given a technical foul when someone tried to vote for him over 20 times in the span of a few minutes. My poll watches for that and froze the voting, keeping IPs and I was able to deduct those votes. However, Manning was unable to capitalize on momentum and that game remains very close.

    David Christopher played some great defense in the lowest scoring game today, pulling ahead late in the half with a 10-0 run to take a lead over Bumbaca.

  • Cynical doesn't even begin to describe me.

    How, you ask, do these people get to be on this honorable list?

    There are three big paths and the best part is that they are all readily accessible to you!

    Here’s the how-to from a seasoned veteran of campus “politics”:

    For the “I only want it for my resumé” crowd:
    1) make enough friends
    2) convince those friends to vote you on to ASM
    3) you’re in!

    For the “I only want to look like I’m making a difference” crowd:
    1) pick a political group on campus (Dems, Republicans, Greens: it don’t matter)
    2) show up at their meetings at least enough to make your presence known
    3) come election time, make sure you pick a position where you won’t have to run against anyone else (if this leaves you confused, consult College Dems for pointers, they excel at this strategy)
    4) you’re in!

    For the “I don’t want to do anything myself, I’d rather just rip on everyone else” crowd:
    1) Attempt to become something sort of resembling a journalist at either paper or else start a blog (CB has this down pat)
    2) Annoyingly show up with your subpar work, hoping to get published
    3) Persist, annoy, persist
    4) Put in a solid 6 months of bottom feeding
    5) Write a column that just reeks of controversy (good topics include: Liberals don’t honor free speech, Pro-Palestine now, [Controversial (yet far more accomplished than you) speaker who visited campus] doesn’t understand the issues)
    6) you’re in!

    Point is: lists like these honor the self indulgent.

    Out of all the people on this list only Eli Judge and editors at either newspaper really deserve it. Eli not only got into a position of power by running a reasonable campaign, but amazingly he actually did something once he got in there. Jill and Mike, and arguably Smathers, put in hours. LOTS of hours at the expense of everything else – you just have to respect that.

    Now I know that is something that confuses the other 16 or so contestants, but when you get in a position of power the reason people wanted (or I suppose were indifferent about the whole thing) you to be there was so that you’d actually do something.

    But, alas, I’m sure you’ve found the logical weakness in my argument. That presumes that you actually care/wanted to do something different in the first place. And when you’re choosing your path off of appearances, why even bother with something like that?

    Congrats to all named, you have certainly “earned” it.

  • The others have put in work. Obviously the ends of their work are contested — and should be — but people like Jeff Wright are doing nothing?

    Can’t say I agree with that.

  • There was a time when not only would editor of the Badger Herald have earned a #1 seed, but some of the paper’s columnists and opinion editors would have been shoe-ins for at-large bids.

    Modell, Vogel, VerStandig, Temple – those were campus “elites.”

  • low scoring? I think you mean “highly efficient.” Look for some clutch 3’s in the next round. Judge: beware

  • I believe you mean: “Jin’s Chicken & Fish Cornelius”

    Don’t ask me why, but that’s what it says.

  • I vote Kyle Szarzynski for #1 seed in the Campus 1337 NIT.

  • I’m satisfied with what I’ve done (SSFC, etc.) and am doing on campus, but there are a lot of people who have done and are doing a lot more (many of which are on this list).

    Quickly, to remove all doubt of CB-Lapidus back room dealings in the making of the list (CB did nothing of the sort):

    What influence did I have in the crafting of this list?

    Practically none.

    I suggested two more names of SSFC/ASM people that were rejected. That was the extent of my involvement.

  • Cynical doesn't even begin to describe me.

    While there certainly is room for disagreement over who fits the bill (after all this wouldn’t be a competition in your eyes if there wasn’t) it’s not fair to those who do the work and make legitimate sacrifices to put some of the others in the same category.

    In the end there really are only two types of campus “elites” in this: those who have actually done something with the position they have and those who haven’t. I’ll leave the sifting for those who care more.

    And to dispel any rumors before they get started, I am not any of these people and I’m likely not even in this conversation as an “elder” statesmen.

  • “#
    Cynical doesn’t even begin to describe me.
    April 10, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    While there certainly is room for disagreement over who fits the bill (after all this wouldn’t be a competition in your eyes if there wasn’t) it’s not fair to those who do the work and make legitimate sacrifices to put some of the others in the same category.

    In the end there really are only two types of campus “elites” in this: those who have actually done something with the position they have and those who haven’t. I’ll leave the sifting for those who care more.

    And to dispel any rumors before they get started, I am not any of these people and I’m likely not even in this conversation as an “elder” statesmen.”

    A lot of movers and shakers on campus (if that is a major component of the “elite” definition) will never get on this list, because they are not at all involved in campus politics (not that politics is a bad activity, it can be a great activity). Kind of mirrors life outside of university doesn’t it?

  • I vote Sam Clegg #1 spot for campus xenophobe, Smathers a close #2.

  • Cynical doesn't even begin to describe me.

    Touché Lapidus, touché.

    But why limit this to politics? If we’re really going for elites, shouldn’t we broaden the scope to include anyone who might be a BMOC?

    Or are we venturing into territory where those who are already in politics end up on the short end of the popularity stick?

    I’d vote for the real elites – the ones you swoon over when you see them on campus. Yeah, I’m looking at you athletes.

    You’re the ones who everyone cares about in the end anyway.

  • because tanner bronson is sooo cool

  • DC: I’m going to have your apartment rezoned to heavy industrial.

    Enjoy the smelter.

  • Hey CB. How about you stop having such incredible blog posts so I can have my boyfriend back? For hours I lose him to reading this hilarious banter…

    Terrorizing roommate relationships(I feel ya, Sam), love relationships, hell, you’re destroyed the lives of everyone who happens to stumble across this sheer genius of a blog.

    Oh, and this contest = t3h funn3h.

    Oh, and everyone vote for David Christopher. (because he’s sexy)

    :)

  • I hung out with Alex Trebek AND Jim Doyle. Together.

    Bring it.

  • EDIT on last post, should read, “Hey CB.”

    i r t3h n00b

  • Swiftboat Badgers for Truth

    When Suchita was “hung(-ing) out” with Trebek and Doyle, she wanted a piece of bread. In her pursuit of her desire, she reached across Trebek’s table setting in a manner that was most uncouth, causing Doyles’ greater sensibilities to go all aflutter.

    Do you want an Elite that would display manners so contrary to polite society?

    Neither do we.

    Paid for by Swiftboat Badgers for Truth

  • “Jin’s Chicken and What?
    April 10, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    I believe you mean: “Jin’s Chicken & Fish Cornelius”

    Don’t ask me why, but that’s what it says.”

    It’s named for Jeff’s dead son.
    You bastard.

  • HUAC is investigating the activities of one Suchita Shah for un-American activities.
    Beware.

  • yay! I got a vote!

  • My competition should be careful, I am known to have a craving for fresh brainz:

    http://www.dpsrecording.com/images/brainz.jpg

  • I think it will be Sol Grosskopf for the win! Long live Student Government

  • from the biodome

    ha I wonder who that post was from… if only everybody else knew about your relationship to sol!

    although, sol could have made the list and done well. he’s the best bullshitter I know and he has some influence on campus (even if his court is a joke). and he’s just so lovable!

  • Lapidus was part of the student government too…

  • Dean ‘dingo’ Bumbaca is one of the hardest working guys up there.

  • You’ve officially lost your mind

  • Is there going to be a Facebook App for this?

  • Wait a Second....

    …over there…. that person…
    ………is that Bassey??

  • hey steve lawrence... oh no!

    the roosevelt institution at UW is a joke…a bunch of rich frat guys using their parent’s connections to pad their resumes. I heard that they were getting (a couple months back) and probably did (I didnt follow up on it) get kicked out of their office space bc there was garbage everywhere! As for Dovere…come on an elite??? he wishes?? biggest shmuck of roosevelt. Didn’t he spend his in entire 2007 summer “working on Roosevelt stuff” aka getting drunk and making a phone call here and there. Thanks for not including him as part of the elite CB!

  • cheap tramadol online
    <a href=”http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/tc_report.pl?gudb=CHEAP+TRAMADOL+ONLINE+”>cheap tramadol
    http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/tc_report.pl?gudb=CHEAP+TRAMADOL+ONLINE+
    [url=http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/tc_report.pl?gudb=CHEAP+TRAMADOL+ONLINE+]cheap tramadol[/url]

  • Good thing Rydell went behind the toolshed… Though the metaphor is neither witty nor appropriate. She’s gonna work super hard in the coming year and the bigger the toolbox the better!

    Too bad this elite thing even exists.

  • When will the preseason rankings for 2009 be available? Will Omar make the top 20?

  • whoooooooooooooooooooo


Leave a Reply